Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice
Volume 38, Issue 4 , Pages 717-728, December 2011

Vaccination Refusal: Ethics, Individual Rights, and the Common Good

  • Jason L. Schwartz, MBE, AM

      Affiliations

    • Department of History and Sociology of Science, Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Market Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Arthur L. Caplan, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medical Ethics, Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Market Street, Suite 320, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

published online 19 September 2011.

Among the obstacles to the success of vaccination programs is the apparent recent increase in hesitancy and outright resistance to the recommended vaccination schedule by some parents and patients. This article reviews the spectrum of patient or parental attitudes that may be described as vaccine refusal, explores related ethical considerations in the context of the doctor-patient relationship and public health, and evaluates the possible responses of physicians when encountering resistance to vaccination recommendations. Health care providers should view individuals hesitant about or opposed to vaccines not as frustrations or threats to public health, but as opportunities to educate and inform.

Keywords: Vaccination, Ethics, Risk, Decision making, Public health

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported by a grant from The Greenwall Foundation.

 The authors have nothing to disclose.

PII: S0095-4543(11)00058-3

doi:10.1016/j.pop.2011.07.009

Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice
Volume 38, Issue 4 , Pages 717-728, December 2011